Posts tagged ‘focus’

January 11th, 2012

Pay Attention

by Johanna Harness

I like that phrase: pay attention. It acknowledges that attention costs us something. In order to pay attention to one thing, other things must be shut down, closed out, put away. In order to pay attention, we have to pull over, stop our routine, and focus.

I admit that I want to experience much more than I have the time or energy to experience.

 

  • I want to read every great new book when it comes out.
  • I want to write reviews.
  • I want a radio show.
  • I want to travel more.
  • I want to do every science experiment in this new book, whether my kids will keep doing them with me or not.
  • I want to invent stuff.
  • I want to tell stories about inventing stuff.
  • I want to tell stories about the stuff I didn’t invent but claim I did.
  • I want to create worlds.
  • I want to read poetry to my children every night.
  • I want to be smarter and wittier and I want to take more and better pictures.
  • I want to spin. For no reason. Just because I’m happy.
  • I want to write a sonnet and not just free verse.
  • I want to write a villanelle because. . . well, who wouldn’t? Villanelles are cool.
  • I want to chew nine packs of gum in one day because I’m an adult and these are the kid things I promised myself I’d love about being an adult.
  • I want to climb trees and sit on my roof—and leave my fear of heights inside under the desk.
  • I want to sit behind the wheel in a parking lot and pretend I’m driving and make loud beeping and crashing noises.
  • And sometime I should crawl out of a car window again—because I got in trouble the one time I did that when I was ten.
  • I want to stand in the middle of a cheering crowd and close my eyes and pretend they’re cheering for me.

I don’t always do such a great job of focusing.

I do actually spend a lot of time spinning from one marvelous thing to another.

I even sometimes complain about this in adult language that makes me appear more responsible. (I have to get this book done for my agent and shuttle the kids to book club and work on their curriculum for the next few months. Look at me. Grrr. I’m responsible.)

But the truth is I’m really soaring through worlds of my imagination, rushing to a place full of stories and intelligent, amazing people, thrilling to the sounds of my kids singing and laughing and story-telling. I’m sitting on the floor with goo and glue and even glitter and wondering at the stars and this amazing new album and maybe quantum physics. This is such an amazing life I lead.

And at the end of the day, that small voice wants to assess. What did I produce? How many pages? How long did it take me?

I hear myself saying, “Pay attention, Johanna.” I hear an owl hooting in the predawn morning and I close my eyes and still myself and I listen. And that keeping-track voice cuts into that time and says, “You just lost half an hour. Pay attention to what you’re doing.”

And then the next day I write an owl into a scene.

I stop everything to talk to my kid about potential energy and kinetic energy and we make bows and arrows out of bamboo skewers and rubber bands and play doh. And I have this internal voice that tells me I should plan things more efficiently so I won’t spend so much time digging through recycling for building supplies.

And then the next day I write a rocket ship that looks suspiciously like empty toilet paper rolls with marshmallows smucked to the side (smucked there with spit because I could not find the glue).

And I’m starting to think that I really should pay attention to that voice a little more. I should stop everything, pull over, and really focus on that voice. And maybe if I do that, I’ll see. I’ll see that it’s a pestering, horrible voice that takes the delight out of everything. It puts hurry-up ahead of slow-down; it puts eat-this over taste-this; it puts read-this over savor-this.

It’s not so much that paying attention is a bad thing, mind you. It’s just that we have to be mindful of what we’re giving our attention. That voice? It’s going in the recycle bin. Maybe we’ll put it in the rocket and send it to the moon. But first I’m going to sprinkle it with glitter.

October 19th, 2010

Phase Drafting (Novel Planning)

by Johanna Harness

It’s NaNoWriMo time again and the chatter moves to novel planning.  I’m posting a couple older posts on the topic and then I’ll add the way I’d plan a novel today (a constantly evolving process).  This first discussion of phase drafting comes from September 3rd, 2009.  There are two blog posts combined here.  The first is my own exploration of writing a “pre-rough draft” and the second shows what happened when someone on twitter pointed me to phase drafting.  Enjoy!



An Extra Step:  The Pre-Rough Draft

September 3, 2009

I’m experimenting with something new as I write the second book in the Claire Morgane series.  I’m adding a step.

I’m not sure if this is necessary.  It may be like the two cups of coffee I poured myself on accident the other morning.  Maybe it’s like washing dishes before you put them in the dishwasher.

Or maybe, quite possibly, this will be useful.  No way to know without trying.

My extra step is writing what is either an extraordinarily detailed outline or a rough, rough draft. It could be described as either.  The step fits between outlining on my big boards and writing the rough draft.

It looks like this:

  • Book Name
  • Main Plot Description
  • Subplot #1 Description
  • Subplot #2 Description
  • Questions raised in 1st book
  • Settings for this book, including new settings
  • Character tables, including new characters
  • Chapter content for each chapter: very detailed.

Some of the chapter material is detailed enough to transfer straight into the rough draft.  Much of it is summary of action to be written later.  This mss will end up being between 15-20K words.

My thought is this:  It would be much easier to edit a draft in this stage than a final draft.  Unpredictable things happen when ideas are fleshed out.  Characters go their own ways.  New characters appear out of nowhere.  Some characters never develop and need to be removed from the draft.  And oh the plot holes!

With my last book, I spent a very long week re-organizing material in my first chapters.  It was complicated but not impossible.  The whole time I had a question buzzing in my mind:  how do I organize the next book so I won’t have to do this again?

I wrote my first chapter on September 1st.  I like it.  But a nagging voice in the back of my head is telling me, “That’s probably not really your beginning.  Nice hook, but not great.”  And yes, it’s also a comforting voice that says, “Oh never mind, you’ll come back to it and it will be fine.”

But I’m stubborn and I want to know:  is there a way I can write better first drafts?  And the logical part of my brain says, “Of course.  Improving your craft is what it’s all about.”

So after my second chapter began intertwining the main plot and a subplot in unproductive ways, I called a stop to construction.  I don’t want to balance the rest of the book on my head while I reconstruct this foundation again and again and again. I want a good, solid foundation for everything that follows.

The problem is that, even with an outline, our stories surprise us.  To build a solid foundation, I could suppress the surprises, but I don’t want to do that.  I like the surprises and I think they make the story more real.  So the other option is trying to discover the surprises in a condensed format:  the pre-rough draft.   Then I can edit the hell out of the pre-rough draft before fleshing out the scenes.

Honestly, I have no idea if this will work for me.  And if it does work for me, I have no idea if it would work for anyone else. I do believe it will improve my writing, whether or not it’s a strategy I adopt long-term.  Maybe it’s the extra support I need for this book and I’ll learn enough through using it that I won’t need it for my next.



Phase Drafting

September 3, 2009

I wrote my last blog entry about the pre-rough draft and immediately received a response from @ShawnScarber who pointed me to “It’s Just A Phase” by Lazette Gifford.

This is one of those days when I want to hug Twitter.  I have an idea, I put it out there, and someone comes back with a wonderful reference that moves me leaps and bounds ahead of where I was.  Yippeee!

When I first heard the phrase, “phase drafting” I thought the author referred to adding another phase to the writing process.  My thought:  you do drafting in phases.  Outline.  Pre-rough draft.  Rough draft.  Revision.  Revision.  Revision.

Then I printed out the article from Lazette Gifford and really studied it.  And I realized that she’s not using the word “phase” to relate to a phase in the writing process.  I had to let go of my pre-conceived ideas to understand.

In her vocabulary, a phase is a piece of a scene.

Oh, that changes everything.  Gifford’s idea is much more advanced than anything I was considering.  It’s so much more wonderful!

I think this is an outlining style that even a pantster would adore.  (Pantster=someone who plots on the fly, by the seat of one’s pants.  Still lost:  origin of the phrase.)

I was attempting to do the pre-rough draft by writing more about each chapter.  It was going okay, but the ideas weren’t flowing as well as they do in full rough-draft writing.

By breaking scenes into phases, the action flows.  There may be 300 or more phases to be developed in the rough draft.  Each phase becomes a writing prompt.

Gifford also presents good ideas about how to keep your writing on track for word count, how to set goals, when to add or subtract phases.  Her short article is a gold mine of information.

I admit when I first read through the article, I was distracted by the speed at which she was able to write using this method.  (I think that may be the reason it took me a while to understand her vocabulary.  Her words about writing a novel in days kept bouncing around in my head like writer-candy.)  As I think more about those of you getting ready for National Novel Writing Month, I can really see how this would help.  And hey, who wouldn’t want to write better faster?

October 16th, 2010

Focus your author identity (Yeah? Yeah.)

by Johanna Harness

I’m not going to tell you how many times I had to abandon this post and begin again because I didn’t have enough focus–ironic, yeah?  (Okay, five times. I restarted it five times.  Also: I suck at keeping secrets.)

I’m warning you right now:  I’m talking about a topic you probably already know about and many of you don’t like the word associated with it, so I’m not going to say it.

What you need is focus.

Go back to basic essay composition:  thesis, supporting ideas, conclusion.  Everything relates back to the thesis.  It’s not enough to write a well-turned phrase.  You also have to have something to say.  The thesis helps a reader understand your point.  Communication with the reader is good.

When you’re writing a story, it’s a good idea if you the author know what the story is about.  You know:  the thing that holds the story together.  The focus.

When you’re writing a scene, you should know how that scene fits into your story and why it’s important. You should know how to focus the scene so it makes your point.

All these are craft-oriented examples and generally accepted (except in experimental forms, which are beyond the focus of this essay).

Remember:  readers need focus if you want them to stay with you.  (If I suddenly started talking about ducks and geese and ignored this essay on writing, you’d be confused–and a bit annoyed. And really, ducks and geese are fine topics.  I rather like them.  And also many species of birds.  But they’re not the focus of this essay. You may already be irritated by this parenthetical note because it strays so.  Annoying, yeah?)

When you’re presenting yourself to readers as an author, they’ll be looking for your focus the same way they look for the focus of your work.  Are you that travel writer who talks about food?  Maybe you’re that guy with the humor column in the newspaper.  Maybe you’re that creepy author who signs his name in blood at book signings.  Maybe you’re even that romance writer who also writes mysteries and has two names but we can usually only remember one of them.  Or you’re that psychologist guy from Colorado who writes mysteries.  Or you’re the one who writes YA free-verse stories about addiction.

I’ll say it again:  just like in your writing, readers are looking for your focus.  They want to know what you’re about.

Can you be more than one thing?  Sure.  Just like I can write about ducks and geese anytime I want, but I’m going to annoy you if I keep bringing it up here.  (It’s Canada Goose by the way. Canadian geese are honkers with a Canadian allegiance.)

If you mush up all the things you want to be, if you run together all your gorgeous, vibrant colors, you end up a very pretty shade of mud.

You’re that one writer.  You know:  the one no one can remember.

And yes, someone will bring up authors who are known for more than one thing, but the fact you’re identifying each thing separately? That means they didn’t get all mushed together.  They are separate, wonderful parts of the same person.  Like a double scoop ice cream cone, each scoop remains separate.

If you want to do this, it’s best if you have something unifying:  like the ice cream cone identity.  What other than genre holds all your work together?  Do all the different stories balance precariously atop a grand family name with deep roots?  Or maybe your genre scoops all find themselves adrift at sea.  Maybe your characters are all named Jim and you can be that author with characters named Jim.

Readers don’t want to know your focus so they can limit you.  They want to know your focus so they can remember you and understand you.

At a party, a fine host will make an introduction between guests by telling them something they share in common:

Host: Jim, this is Johanna.  She’s an author who enjoys ducks and geese.  Johanna, this is Jim.  He’s a goose in the books of that one author whose books all are about characters named Jim.

Johanna:  It’s nice to meet you, Jim!  I love geese!

Jim:  Honk!

Probably you’re not going to have something in common with all readers.  Probably all readers are not going to like your writing.  That’s okay because there are a lot of readers and a lot of writers.  If you make your focus clear enough, you’ll be introduced to readers who are apt to like you.

Host:  This is Johanna.  She writes humorous YA fantasies about a paranormal girl in The New West.  This is Jim.  He’s a clairvoyant character in the works of that one author who always names his characters Jim.

Johanna:  It’s great to meet you, Jim!  I’d love to hear your thoughts about Claire.

Jim:  I knew you were going to say that.

So here’s the thing:  Readers need a focus to remember you.  If you provide mud, they probably won’t remember you unless one of two things happens:

1. Your publisher provides a focus for you.

2. You do or say something so foolish it creates an identity you do not want.

I’m sure there’s a number three possibility here wherein you’re discovered by someone amazing who loves your work.  But you still have to own your own cool.  Being tangentially related to cool is not enough.

How do you avoid being pigeon-holed by a publisher, being marked forever as the hopeful author who picked fights with agents, or being the wannabe writer sibling/friend/spouse of the famous dude?

You define yourself.

You tell the world who you are.

Repeatedly.

You say it so many times you can say it in your sleep.

You pitch it.

You put it on your website.

You make a logo.

You create yourself a focus so clear that it morphs into its own weird pitch.

Host:  This is Johanna. She writes those weird paranormal stories set in future Idaho.

Jim:  I think I’ve heard of you!

Johanna:  Aren’t you the one with all the characters named Jim?  I keep seeing them everywhere!

Oh.  And also:  Branding.  (I’m bad at keeping secrets.)


Switch to our mobile site