Posts tagged ‘hashtag’

August 29th, 2010

Clustering

by Johanna Harness

(Note: This post originally appeared in my old blog on December 2, 2009.  As topics reappear in discussion, I’m transferring the content here.)

The cluster pictured here is one I did for this blog entry, based on #amwriting.  I ended up considering something that happens repeatedly in the chat: someone says they are not really writing because they’re editing or planning or doing research or some other writing-related activity.  My direction at the end of the cluster is leading me toward a discussion of all the things that really should be included in a definition of writing.

Clustering is one of those things I thought I understood until I really experienced it.

I’m 42 years old.  I was introduced to clustering and mind mapping in high school.  The basic idea taught to me was that you put an idea in the center of the page, circle it, and then brainstorm ideas out from there.  For me, mind mapping was a messy, graphic way of outlining.  They were interchangeable for me and linear outlining was much easier to understand later.  So for years, I was under the impression that I knew all about this method and it just didn’t work for me.

I went to the SCBWI Conference in Utah last month and took a workshop presented by Terri Farley, author of the middle grade Phantom Stallion series.  When she started talking about clustering, I admit there was an inner-me that yawned and said, “not this again.”  Being a polite conference attendee, I listened.  Politely.  Then I listened attentively.  And finally, I realized she was talking about clustering in a way I had never considered.

I also should admit Terri really spoke to me because so many of her creative thoughts resonated with my own creative process.  She talked about sitting on the floor during her planning.  She uses notecards and she does a lot of her pre-planning work by hand.  So when she told us that clustering works for her, every time, that it’s a go-to method she relies upon, I was more open to hearing what she had to say.

These are the points that changed my experience of clustering:

  • Cluster by hand.  Don’t use the pretty computer programs. There is something magical that happens between right and left brain when you physically draw circles and lines.
  • Use words for the left brain.  Use free association between words for the right brain.
  • Don’t edit the flow of ideas.
  • Cluster until you feel direction.  I know when this happens for me because I start writing in sentences or lists.  My left brain knows where to go with all the details I’ve thrown at it.

Terri told a story about a heart-wrenching experience she had observing wild horses.  When she returned to her car, she couldn’t begin to put words to what she had witnessed, so she clustered her thoughts.  Within a few minutes, even with tears streaming down her cheeks and emotions everywhere, she had captured everything she needed to write about the experience, including the angle from which she would tell the story.

This spoke to me.

There are many times when I feel overwhelmed by my emotional response to my characters and their story–usually because I’m writing about something reflected in my own life in some way.  My standard response has been to wait for the strong emotion to pass and then find a logical approach to the topic at a later time.

Clustering allows me to get my thoughts on paper and find direction using my emotions (and not in spite of them).  This is a Big Deal.

Terri credits Gabriele Rico with opening up clustering for her.  The amazing thing to me is that I have Rico’s book, Writing The Natural Way, on my bookshelf.  I was already familiar with her ideas before I attended Terri’s workshop.  I can go to Rico’s website and read and I still see the words through old eyes.

Sometimes we need to hear the translation of an idea through another writer’s experience.  If I can do that for anyone with this blog entry, that’s a very good thing.

Remember:  cluster by hand, use circles and lines, don’t censor the connections between words.

And about the messiness of it?  Once you have the idea, it’s in your head.  You don’t ever have to look at the cluster again.  The value is in the process not the product.  How cool is that?

August 3rd, 2010

Happy Birthday, #Amwriting!

by Johanna Harness


One year ago today #amwriting started. It’s a birthday. Or a hashtagversary. Or something. It’s cool; that’s what it is.

I’ve been asked since: how does one go about creating a hashtag that takes off like this one did? My answer: I have no idea. I can only tell you how this one started.

Just over a year ago I was hashtag invisible. I had a twitter bug that kept my tweets from appearing in hashtag searches and, thus, live chats. I didn’t know about the bug. I would go to chats, participate, and no one would respond to me. I thought I was just monumentally unpopular. When I found out I was really invisible, I felt a little stupid and I registered a help ticket to correct my search issues. Then I waited–a long time–for a response.

In the meantime, I found that people would respond to me when I’d do a regular shout-out, asking “who is writing right now?” Any time I was writing and felt alone in it, I could call out and ten or twelve people would respond. My only problem was that I then had a conversation going with ten or twelve people and I was no longer writing. I wanted to know other writers were writing alongside me, hear them talking to me AND each other, participate here and there, and get back to work.

So I tried something different: as more people responded to my semi-regular shout-outs, I experimented with retweeting comments, hoping writers would find each other and continue the conversation, even after I moved on to writing. It didn’t work that way. Instead, the more I retweeted, the more new people responded. Instead of talking with ten or twelve people, I was now conversing with twenty or twenty-five.

#amwriting rose out of a synchronicity of events that happened in one evening. A follower DM’d me and said, “I have to unfollow you because you tweet and retweet way too much” and an email came in telling me my hashtag invisibility was fixed.

The next morning when I did my call-out, I suggested a hashtag with morning implications–because it was morning in my part of the world. I immediately received responses from people all over the world saying, “What about me? I’m writing right now, but it’s not morning here. Can I play?”

And honestly, my immediate response was, “OMG. Someone from across the world is writing at the same time I’m writing. My sun is coming up and their sun is going down and it’s the same sun and look! There’s someone else fixing soup for lunch every afternoon when I’m barely awake here and I’m not even in the same season with half these people–and we’re still writing alongside each other and we’re caring about the same things and this is the most amazing thing EVER!”

And I responded: “Um, yeah, that’s cool.”

So for about an hour during a time that happened to be morning where I was, this hashtag was for morning writers, because I was totally provincial and short-sighted. During the second hour of existence, “AM writing” came to mean “I am writing” because it was better.

Then, about an hour after that, @inkyelbows showed up in a room full of chatter and asked how long we’d been meeting and she asked for information she could post on her website about the chat.

And I was thinking, “We have a chat?” And I looked around and there were about thirty people chatting and I realized, “oh, yeah, we have a chat.” So I wrote something up and sent it to Debbie. (Thank you, Debbie!) And then more people asked, so I created a FAQ (http://bit.ly/9yoZUE).

Every morning I’d do the same call-out, but I encouraged people to talk to one another and not just me–and I pointed them to the FAQ. More people showed up every day. Then they started showing up before me–and staying after I’d gone. I remember discovering #amwriting discussion continuing two hours after I left the chat and I was so excited I couldn’t stand it.

My goal became something simple: I wanted #amwriting to grow big enough it wouldn’t need me anymore.

Today we’re there.

We have over 2000 active participants and you can find writers posting to #amwriting around the clock. We have published and pre-published, indie and traditional, business writers and novelists, and we cross boundaries without blinking.

The one thing that pulls us all together, always, is that we are practicing our craft. It doesn’t matter how much we have written in the past or what our intentions might be for future writing. What matters is the moment of writing: the process. It’s great to know someone will celebrate with you when you spend your day replacing passive verbs with active–or when you finally find the perfect name for your dastardly character with a sexy limp. It’s great to know that you can ask goofy writer research questions like, “what’s the circumference of a blood spatter under these conditions?” and someone probably knows. Or you can say, “I’m switching from third to first person” and others understand the mountain of work to which you’ve committed yourself. It’s great to have people like Joe “Mr. Clarity” Roy reminding us that the well-turned phrase impacts more than a novel or poetry; it impacts everything within a business or organization.

So on this day when #amwriting turns a year old, I do my regular call-out: “Who is writing right now?” and I lift my cup to writers everywhere, no matter where you are or what you write–because you people are the smartest people anywhere and I’m so incredibly lucky to know you. Thank you for opening your hearts and minds not just to me, but to each other. It’s been a great first year.


Switch to our mobile site