Posts tagged ‘revision’

February 8th, 2012

What kind of sandwich?

by Johanna Harness

It seemed like an innocent question.

I’d been working on two short stories for contest submissions.  The first story was close to 7,000 words long, packed with details, and I’d been working on it for weeks.  The second story I constructed out of leftover research.  The first story was elegant.  The second story was Frankenstein’s monster.

What do I mean by leftover research?  Simple. These were the characters I started to write about in the first story, but I rejected them. Their personalities didn’t work.  Their setting didn’t fit the story I wanted to tell.  The time frame didn’t mesh with the plot.  But then it came time to write the shorter story and they were all I had.  So tap-tap-tap, they got a story.

When I read it aloud, it wasn’t quite as bad as I thought it was.  My faithful readers laughed with me, not at me.  They helped me find the good.  I scribbled all over the pages and saw just how to improve.  I was about to get back to work, when one of them asked, “What kind of sandwich?”

“What?”

“The sandwich.  In that setting, what are they eating?”

I thought I’d finish my revisions that night, but that question stopped me.

My reader brushed it off.  “It’s not important.  I was just wondering.”

But it was important—because I didn’t know. Usually, even if I don’t include details in the story, I know them.  Ask me what my characters are doing or saying when they’re not on the page and I know.  Ask me what fiber their clothes are made from and I know.  Ask me if they wear perfume or like garlic or prefer yams to sweet potatoes—and I know!  But this sandwich?  It really threw me off.

That sandwich became the key for revising the entire story, because it pointed me toward sensory details.  Not only did I lack the ability to taste this world, but I also wasn’t smelling or hearing or touching the world either.  Everything I saw looked like it came from an old photograph.  It wasn’t real.

I researched different things then:  lunch menus and flowering trees and boots and hats.  What would my main character read, if she read at all?  How would she spend the bulk of her days?  What made her different than everyone else in that same setting?

By the time I was done, I had a new story with real characters.  Their voices linger with me still, whispering new possibilities for future adventures.  For now, however, I’m content.

Oh—and the sandwich?  It was boiled egg.  And she carried it in a shiny metal pail. And the lilacs bloomed in that space just beyond the barn.  She wasn’t paying attention to the fragrance though because she had her eye on two young men—the ones who seemed a little too well-dressed and a little too interested in her father’s ranch.  Now mind you, none of those details made it into the story. They aren’t even details from my main character’s point of view.  But they cracked that narrative wide open.

Next time you’re stuck, you might try asking yourself:  “What kind of sandwich?”

December 14th, 2011

The Craft of Writing: Revision

by Johanna Harness

 

Revising is not the same thing as editing.

When I edit my work, my vision of the story remains the same.  I may eliminate entire chapters, rewrite complete scenes, change every sentence in the book, but the structure remains. I have a stack of edits sitting beside me: pages full of marks and squiggles and notes to “tighten” or “rephrase” or simply “fix.”  Edits are often about wordsmithery. I pour myself into a world of sound and rhythm and presentation. Editing is a delicious way to spend time if you love words.

The world of revision is a messier place.

If editing is rearranging furniture, revision is knocking down walls.

Revision takes a good deal more skill than writing or editing and I’m not convinced most writers ever do it.  It’s not that they can’t do it. It’s just a hellishly frightening leap and it’s enormously difficult.  The easier path, always, is to set aside a book that needs serious revision—and write a better one from scratch.

Remember: you don’t have to make a lifetime commitment to every book you write. My first book was so bad, I don’t even claim it as my first book.  I call it Book Zero.  I’m convinced gazing on it directly may cause blindness. I’m not going back there. And that’s okay.

So why revise? If revising is more difficult than writing a new and better novel, why do it?

I’ve found only one reason: because a really wonderful idea chose me and I discovered, through the process of writing, that I lacked the skills to do it justice. I wanted to tell that story more than any of the stories I possessed the skills to tell.

We revise to become better writers, to earn the right to tell complex tales.  Is that worth our time?  Maybe it depends on the story.

So what do some of those scary revisions look like?

 

During the course of revising five novels, I have:

 

  • Changed the point of view. Changed it again.  Oh why not? Changed it again.
  • Changed from past to present tense. Fell in love with it.  Fell out of love with it. Changed it back.
  • Eliminated a significant subplot, including a major character.  (The first major character I eliminated was named Mim.  Now, whenever a character disappears from a novel, my early readers and I call it “being mimmed.”)
  • Changed the focus of the entire book by changing what the main character wants. I’ve done this one more than once. This usually results in eliminating more than half the chapters, inserting new ones, and rewriting the ones that remain.
  • Changed the rules under which my world operated.
  • Pulled out a tightly-woven subplot to make it the focus of a separate book.
  • Eliminated an entire setting in the book, creating new bridges from Point B to C and Point D to E.  (The real challenge here was working in the material I wanted to keep.)
  • Discovered that an existing plot hole revealed more of interest than the current plot line. Reconstructed the whole thing.
  • Changed the relationship between major characters.

 

And what did I gain from all this?

 

  • Confidence. I’m no longer afraid of any change request. I know I can do it.
  • Loyalty to a story above any set of words. If I can make the story better, I’ll cut my favorite scene in the book. It will make room for one I love even more.
  • Material for future narratives.  The beloved bits I eliminate become polished material for later writing.
  • Skill and flexibility. Not only can I make the changes, I have energy to play, to see which version I like best.
  • A wicked sense of humor about my characters and the changes they go through.

What’s the biggest revision you’ve ever undertaken?  What did you learn from it?

July 27th, 2011

When I say I #amwriting. . . (my process)

by Johanna Harness

It always amazes me when I say I am writing (or I #amwriting as I often say on Twitter) and someone understands that to mean I am filling a blank page with new words.

Writing is so much more than new words—so much more than a flight of fancy edited to eliminate typos and grammatical errors.

Writing is a process of crafting a full piece of writing.  It is a labor of love (and torment) and it includes so many more steps than making new words pop up on a screen.

One morning a couple weeks ago, I sat down and constructed two flow charts to try to explain to a friend what it is I do when I say I #amwriting.

First, I give you my process of creating a rough draft:

click to enlarge

When the rough draft is complete, I begin the adventure of major reconstruction. It looks something like this:

click to enlarge

So when I say I #amwriting, now you know.  I’m somewhere on the path toward crafting a final piece of writing.  Am I writing new words?  I might be, but I wouldn’t count on it.

- – -

This post originally appeared on the Gem State Writers Blog on July 20, 2011.


Switch to our mobile site